View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2012, 15:00
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,869
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possible Frame Design

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmxer51 View Post
I know only 4 cims are allowed. The CAD models just had two per toughbox so i just left them. I will take into account the small wheel base thanks for the input!
If you only plan on having 1 CIM in each I would closely consider the Toughbox Nano for reduced weight over the standard Toughbox.

Edit: on second thought, you might consider direct-driving your Mecanum wheels from nano Toughboxes.

Some spacers/bracing in between each side plate will go a long way towards chassis rigidity and strength. Something like this: http://www.mcmaster.com/#cadinlnord/91780a075/=fu19e2
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.

Last edited by JamesCH95 : 16-01-2012 at 15:04.