View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2012, 20:21
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
no team (Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,620
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: Physics Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpconnors9 View Post
I was thinking that you have to at least know the angle and the x position but a team member is looking for an equation that is just variables. I don't get how it would work -- does this just not make sense.
like xf = xo +vxo t +1/2 at^2 is an equation with all variables but it can't really tell us anything if we have just one variable
You're right, it doesn't make sense. It's not a matter of difficulty of derivation; what you're looking for is definitively indeterminate without more information*. An unfortunate fact of physics (and life).

You simply cannot determine a ball's kinematic behavior based solely on its initial speed (scalar magnitude without angle). As an extreme example, take two balls shot at 5 m/s. One is launched at 45deg above the horizontal. The other is launched straight down. Which has a larger x displacement?

*Cue someone telling me this is too sweeping a generalization. do'h
__________________

Last edited by Siri : 19-01-2012 at 20:26. Reason: clarifying