View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2012, 19:28
Matt H. Matt H. is offline
Long Distance Mentor
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 238
Matt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond reputeMatt H. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is It Just Me or...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli View Post
You need a complete understanding, mathematically, of your physical system for a Kalman filter to be effective..
This is false. Simplified models of your system can be used in effective Kalman filters provided you add uncertainty from the model.

See this paper which is an overview of the Kalman filter (esp. the section on Filter Parameters and Tuning and the Extended Kalman filter):
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/media/pdf/kalman_intro.pdf

Quote:
Sometimes a relatively simple (poor) process model can produce acceptable results if one “injects” enough uncertainty into the process via the selection of Q [process noise covariance].

That being said, I agree that Kalman filters are generally overkill for FRC.