View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-01-2012, 07:06
wireties's Avatar
wireties wireties is offline
Principal Engineer
AKA: Keith Buchanan
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 1,170
wireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond reputewireties has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to wireties
Re: Top/bottom roller shooter vs. bottom roller only

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
With one driven wheel at 1500 RPM, you get the same exit velocity as with two driven wheels at 750 RPM. So I am leaning towards the two driven wheel solution.
I think the initial velocity of the ball is a function of the rotational velocity at the edge of the wheel. Wouldn't your 2-wheel example just produce 2X torque (if driven at the same speed) rather than 2X initial velocity of the ball? I must be missing something...

Our students built a 2-wheel prototype (both on the bottom) that is pretty consistent and decided not to look at a 2-wheel (top & bottom) shooter.
Reply With Quote