View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2012, 18:57
JohnBoucher JohnBoucher is offline
Blue Shirt
FRC #0237
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Watertown, CT
Posts: 2,927
JohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond reputeJohnBoucher has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Website Award question

It's simply good practice to validate your code. Almost anything will render in some fashion, but the cleaner the code, the better the rendering. It also helps with your site being indexed.

Validation errors also tend to cascade. One error spawns multiple small errors. The validator gives lots of info on fixing the code.

I agree with rsisk, it's a judgement call. The reviewer can also give extra points if they think you deserve it. A site that validates html, css and Cynthia says deserves the extra points.

I had one last year that left a note in the code saying he did not care about validation.
Reply With Quote