Thread: LED Ring Light
View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2012, 14:49
Mr V's Avatar
Mr V Mr V is offline
FIRST Senior Mentor Washington
FRC #5588 (Reign)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Maple Valley Wa
Posts: 994
Mr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond repute
Re: LED Ring Light

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Pahl View Post

Make sure you use a mechanically robust connection, such as a crimp butt splice
In the world of vehicle electronics crimp butt connectors are not considered robust. By reputable automotive electricians they are often referred to as emergency or temporary connectors or guaranteed failure points. For those that masquerade as "professional" technicians that use them they are referred to as job security.

The best ways in my opinion, to join the gauge of wire that normally is attached to the ring LEDs to the 18 ga wire would be to:

A. Solder them and cover them with adhesive lined heat shrink.

B. If you don't want to solder is to use a un-insulated parallel crimp connector and cover it with adhesive lined heat shrink. Even then I'd suggest soldering.

Those 2 methods meet the OEM level conditions for joining wire of different gauges or a splice of wire of the same gauges for either Ford, GM, Chrysler, Navistar (International) or Paccar (Kenworth and Peterbilt) depending on who's service literature you consult (with the solder in the second method).
__________________
All statements made on Chief Delphi by me are my own opinions and are not official FIRST rulings or opinions and should not be construed as such.




https://www.facebook.com/pages/Team-...77508782410839

Last edited by Mr V : 28-01-2012 at 14:55. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote