View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-01-2012, 10:27
rbmj rbmj is offline
Registered User
FRC #0612 (Chantilly Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: DC Area/Fairfax County
Posts: 192
rbmj is a jewel in the roughrbmj is a jewel in the roughrbmj is a jewel in the rough
Re: cRIO v43 == fail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
Once you recognize that the modules are not addressed by slot number in the 2012 image, it all makes a lot more sense. The first module of any type is number 1; the second one is number 2.
I missed that. So it's 1, 2 - not 0, 1? And these will corrospond to the first/second sidecars?

Thanks!

As a side note, I like it better when they're addressed by absolute slot number. Makes coordination between electrical and programming easier, and that way you can keep track of what's on what slot (it'll look like the analog and digitals are on the same slot now). But if that's how it's done now...
Reply With Quote