Thread: Question for rule [R02]
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2012, 23:32
nitneylion452's Avatar
nitneylion452 nitneylion452 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Lee
FRC #3167 (Environmental Tectonics Crusaders)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 596
nitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud of
Re: Question for rule [R02]
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
No. You need to read later Q&A answers, or the ongoing discussion on the implications of those answers. Effectively, H-shaped appendages are out. It's not "appendage" that's in question anymore, it's "contiguous" and "where does the contiguous portion have to be to not get called for two appendages?" Not fun to sort through.
I looked through all of the questions regarding <R02>, and didn't see anything about that. Do you have a link or a suggestion what to look under?
__________________
Joe
"The ones who will one day rule the world rule the basketball court today."

http://www.fatherjudgerobotics.webs.com

Volunteer 2012 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
Volunteer 2013 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset