View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2012, 06:47
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,751
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: IMAQ error upon code deploy

I sent a PM and email about how I can help. I can't say where or even if the deleted calls are documented. The size increase was quite the surprise to us, and we had no choice but to upgrade, so we gave guidance to the vision team and they were nice enough to lighten the load for us.

My initial guess is that the dependency on calibration is due to using the more advanced, and presumably more expensive edge and measurement features. It may also be as simple as deleting some of the subVIs incorporated by the code generator.

I'm pretty sure we can work with this. I'm glad to lend a hand.

As for not giving answers -- you can't give what you don't have ...

Greg McKaskle
Reply With Quote