Thread: 2nd Most Awaited Q and A Answer?
View Single Post
  #100   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-02-2012, 22:58
nitneylion452's Avatar
nitneylion452 nitneylion452 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Lee
FRC #3167 (Environmental Tectonics Crusaders)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 596
nitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud ofnitneylion452 has much to be proud of
Re: 2nd Most Awaited Q and A Answer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsonmw04 View Post
so if I add rubber bands to my "H" and attach them to a wire so that as they deploy downward they remain "contiguous" but in functionality they are two separate pieces it would be legal?
So, I would follow the letter of the law and not the spirit of the law? I find that situation indefensible and ripe for an update.
Stringing a rubber band around the prongs of the H wouldn't really make them contiguous. When I think contiguous, I think rigid attachments.
__________________
Joe
"The ones who will one day rule the world rule the basketball court today."

http://www.fatherjudgerobotics.webs.com

Volunteer 2012 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset
Volunteer 2013 MAR Region Championship - Field Reset