View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-02-2012, 18:43
Tuba4 Tuba4 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tom Albert
FRC #0063 (The Red Barons)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Erie, Pa
Posts: 137
Tuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant futureTuba4 has a brilliant future
Re: 2nd Most Awaited Q and A Answer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveGPage View Post
An update:

[G21]Robots may extend one appendage up to 14 in. beyond a single edge of their frame perimeter at any time.
Violation: Foul for exceeding size allotments; Technical-Foul for continuous or repeated violations.


These appendages are intended for use in manipulating Basketballs and/or Bridges. A Robot may have multiple extension devices onboard, but only one may be deployed at a given time.

All portions of an appendage that are outside the Frame Perimeter must be contiguous with each other. Very brief violations of the contiguity requirement as a single appendage is being extended or retracted will not be penalized.
This is good news. It should put the question to rest for most kinds of appendages. I am not certain how it will impact ball harvesters using a rotating drum with surgical tubing whips, which seem to be a common choice. I think they may still not be legal. Clearly if the drum does not extend beyond the frame perimeter and only the "whips" do, that would not be legal. And if your drum was able to move and extend, then it would need to retract in order to extend a bridge appendage.