Quote:
Originally Posted by Madison
Given how consistent the Q&A responses were regarding contiguity outside the frame perimeter, it isn't unreasonable to expect that a number of teams -- mine included -- revised or redesigned mechanisms to accommodate the narrow definition of appendage.
The contents of the team update make sense, but it's frustrating that it's an about-face after weeks of getting a consistently different answer.
|
"Hey guys, what if we just latched onto the tower at our end and fed soccer balls back into our own goals?"
"No way the GDC is going to let that loophole lie open."
The best thing you can do, I think, is design to what the vaguest of definitions make the most sense. This year, a light manual has meant few definite answers and an unfortunately high dependence on the Q&A.