Quote:
Originally Posted by Aren_Hill
If they respond twice, to two questions asking for the definition of bridge, with an answer that defines that ramp as part of the bridge, on a QnA forum defined as official interpretation, why wouldn't it be allowed?
|
Because the intent is clearly to be on top the bridge. If they dont want people hanging from the bridge why would they want you to drive under it to balance?
Its obviously a loophole that they mistakenly opened with their Q&A response.
Obviously you shouldnt have to judge intent and the Q&A needs massive improvement but nobody should be surprised at this update.