Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123
If the GDC had known that teams were thinking about driving under the bridge (which I don't think they were, this only came out a few days ago), they would have given a different answer.
|
That's stupid. If that's what the GDC was actually thinking, then they're defining the game based on their guess of what teams would do when they read the manual rather than creating a set of specifications and allowing actual creativity and risk taking.
How can anyone blame a team for taking two Q&A answers and using that as design criteria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by efoote868
If the question was, "Since the ball ramp is considered part of the bridge assembly, will a robot sitting under the bridge on the ball ramp count as balanced?" The obvious answer is "No, stop lawyering the rules."
|
"Obvious" is an imprecise term.