Quote:
Originally Posted by pfreivald
That's an odd statement. It was never unclear -- the specification was that you are above the platform and not supported by another robot; they never gave any guidelines as to how.
|
It's also an odd statement to say a robot is not "on the bridge" if they gave the specification that "the bridge" is an assembly that includes a piece of lexan.
The only difference to me is that in one instance, the GDC changed the rules to outlaw a robot design, and in another, they didn't.
Why is hanging from the side of a bar "common sense" but supporting yourself with a non-obvious piece of the bridge "lawyering the rules"?