
17-02-2012, 23:22
|
 |
 |
Harps On Websites
AKA: John Maguire
 FRC #3322 (Eagle Imperium)
Team Role: Webmaster
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 74
|
|
|
Re: Project NEO Team 1164 website
Quote:
Originally Posted by zim2411
Honestly, validation isn't really important. Some of the best sites out there don't validate -- most Google products fail validation completely, but they still work just fine cross browser wise. Focus on content.
|
While you are correct that many of the big name sites don't validate, I disagree that it isn't important. I have a few reasons to back this up:
- You lose points for the Website Award by not being valid.
- The more correct tags you use, and working (X)HTML, the better bots will crawl your page for content, and understand what the content is.
- Deviating from standards is what invented the <blink> and <marquee> tags during the browser war.
- Standards make sure that anyone can pick up the language with an understanding of what is, and what isn't correct, and therefore makes it more maintainable.
- Just because it works now, without standards, in "most browsers," doesn't mean it will in the future. Following standards ensures that your site should always be cross-browser compatible (except in rare cases where browsers haven't adopted the standards correctly, in which case it is no longer your fault.)
|