[lscime]

Hmm, I guess I would have to disagree with an "emphasis" on Juniors over Seniors. Seniors on-average will have had more time to contribute to their team, their community, and FIRST in general, and that extra year of "impact" will make them a stronger DL candidate. In my own opinion I believe that the award should go to the students who have demonstrated the greatest leadership and impact in their teams and communities. Students who are by all measures integral to the success and growth of FIRST in their areas.

I agree with the argument that having the DL award on a resume is more beneficial to a Junior than a Senior. But the award is so much more than a line on a resume. Because it is so powerful and significant in its own right, I hope that the most deserving/qualified students are recognized for their often monumental efforts, regardless of their grade level.

Just my 2 cents,
-Luke