View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2012, 23:39
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 519
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ruling on Robonauts Balance

I just hope this helps the GDC realize that there is a REASON these specific to design questions are asked in the Q&A isn't because we want to ask for design reviews, we need to know whether or not certain and specific robot-robot or robot-field element/game piece interactions are legal in order to build robots within the rules. Something that is vague and without formal definition is immediately something that needs clearing up. Although I personally agree with the GDC's decision as to the "grappling" associated with 118's mechanism, I would like to thank the Robonauts for a few things:

1. Pushing the envelope
2. Inspiring others to push the envelope
3. Hopefully showing the GDC why this kind of legality is an important thing to decide week 1 or 2 of build; not week 1 of competitions. Would this have gone on til week had that been when 118 first competed? That would be ridiculous... (it already is in my mind).
__________________
[2016-present] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
Reply With Quote