View Single Post
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2012, 11:35
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,753
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Control System Design Contest Proposal

Sorry about that. How about rephrasing it as a requirement?

The system communications should be sufficiently transparent, or have sufficient diagnostics, so that teams are able to get their robot moving ...
in their shop or classroom,
in the pits,
on the practice field,
on the official field,
without resorting to 50 foot tethers.

And when it doesn't move, they are able to effectively debug the issue instead of blaming field gremlins.

Greg McKaskle
Reply With Quote