Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxom
I disagree. While the balls getting under the bridges are a pain, they pose the same problem to every team. I saw several different ways teams at KC removed them, and at least one time I saw a robot get up on the bridge even though there was a ball on their side of the bridge. It kind of hopped up in a couple of stages.
I think the bigger problem is knowing that the balls are there, and where they are. That's another engineering problem, and I expect to see some different ways to solve it by the time we get to the St. Louis regional in week 4.
There's also the non-engineering part of the problem. Such as spending too much time trying to remove a ball when there's a better alternative like going to the other side. There were also times where it really wasn't even necessary to use the bridge.
I'd hate to see the field changed at this point. All of the teams have the same problem. I'd much rather see FIRST address the problems associated with volunteer food (seriously -- no filet mignon & lobster?) and inspector compensation. Are we really supposed to believe that working with great teams of both students & mentors is all we get out of this?
|
They don't exactly pose the same problem to every team though. There are situations where it is actually impossible to get a ball out from under the bridge, and it happens to only one team that match. That match could be a tie-breaker finalist match.