View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-03-2012, 21:05
Jaxom Jaxom is offline
Registered User
AKA: Michael Hartwig
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 379
Jaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant futureJaxom has a brilliant future
Re: Rookie Team Passing Inspection (video)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandiegodan View Post
I inspected in San Diego and I didn't see any of that particular issue. It was mostly about the 8" minimum supported bumper from the vertex when the bot had a ball opening on the narrow end of the frame.
The bumper issues I remember were almost all this 8" problem, although we also had a few with numbers that didn't meet the rules.

I did have one robot I inspected that had to add an attachment when they went from a 6" to a full 8" section at the side of their opening. There was only one attachment on the original segment & it was closer to the corner than it was to the opening; adding the extra 2" would have left a pretty wobbly bumper without a 2nd attachment.
__________________


Mentor http://www.teamtitanium.org/
Reply With Quote