Thread: Is This Not A Viable Strategy?
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-03-2012, 22:10
davidthefat davidthefat is offline
Alumni
AKA: David Yoon
FRC #0589 (Falkons)
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: California
Posts: 792
davidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud ofdavidthefat has much to be proud of
Re: Is This Not A Viable Strategy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekcrbe View Post
The way to go depends largely on the score of the match in qualifications. If you can win the match with 10 points from balancing your bridge--or possibly 20 if you have an alliance partner on the bridge with you--but go for coopertition if either side is winning by more than 20 points (and therefore the result cannot be changed by balancing the red and blue bridges). Winning with no coopertition gives you 2 qualification points and the other alliance 0, whereas losing with coopertition would give you 2 points and them 4. So you won't get any more qualification points, but you will be higher ranked because the other teams will be comparatively lower.
Well, I don't think my mentor understands that. I'll try explaining to him tomorrow.
__________________
Do not say what can or cannot be done, but, instead, say what must be done for the task at hand must be accomplished.