Quote:
Originally Posted by sandiegodan
Since there is no 8" minimum frame requirement on it's own, it would make sense to me that if an 8" bumper carried it's own continuous metal backing and could be securely attached to the frame, that would constitute a legal system? Providing it met weight of course.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol
Allowable bumper materials are plywood, noodles, fabric, fasteners and optional angle reinforcements. Nothing else. Which is why the suggestion of integral metal reinforcement of the bumper itself isn't permitted.
|
The metal backing has been determined to be "fastener" in the past. The reason that a metal backing on the bumper is not considered "frame" is because it's attached to the bumper, not the robot. "Frame" must meet all robot size and weight requirements. It really starts to become a "I need to see the specific implementation" headache, and I'm dreading some of the things we are going to see at Championship with the requisite "But it passed at XXX regional" commentary.
__________________
Team 5148 - 2014 Wisconsin Regional Rookie All-Stars!!
Mentor: 1379: 2004-2008 / 2530: 2008-2013 / 2861: 2009 / 5148: 2014-??
Lead Robot Inspector: 10,000 Lakes '09 - '11 / Lake Superior '11-'12 / Northern Lights '13, '15 - '16 / Championship '09 - '12, '14 - '15
Attending/Inspecting 2017: TBD, Wisconsin, STL Championship
"Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple" -Dr. Seuss