Thread: What Shooter Design was Most Consistent
View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-03-2012, 18:20
CalTran's Avatar
CalTran CalTran is offline
Missouri S&T Senior
FRC #2410 (BV CAPS Metal Mustang Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 2,369
CalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond reputeCalTran has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What Shooter Design was Most Consistent
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfreivald View Post
I don't know that this is answerable by anyone on this forum... It depends on what your team can get to work well between now and then!
I suppose the question would be how easily did other teams find dialing in a compression hood shooter? And if they happen to have experience from previous years, is it easier to dial in a compression hood rather than a quad wheel shooter? How much time and testing did it take other teams to map out the rpms?
__________________
Team 2410 thinks KISSing is amazing! Keep It Super Safe!
  • "You know you've been in robotics too long when you start talking to your tools." "Well, you've been in robotics CLEARLY too long when they start talking back"
  • Theory is when you know everything but nothing works. Practice is when everything works but you don't know why. On our team, theory and practice comes together - nothing works and nobody knows why.
MMR 2410 Student (2010 - 2013) | MMR 2410 Mentor (2013 - Present)
FTC Game Announcer / EmCee (2014 - Present) | FRC EmCee (2015 - Present) | FRC Referee (2016)
Academic Student (Forever)
Reply With Quote