View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-03-2012, 21:55
remulasce remulasce is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Mtn View
Posts: 139
remulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to beholdremulasce is a splendid one to behold
Re: 2012-Greater Toronto Regional East

Quote:
Both teams don't design and manufacture their own robots. They have professional engineers and mentors do it for them.
That's a pretty serious allegation. Do you have evidence of this, and what standard for "student designed and built" do you hold to be un-GP? I think we all agree that mentors are essential for FIRST teams, can you identify the point at which other teams no longer have an obligation to be GP to them?

I personally see no reason why teams should not get parts sent out for manufacturing. This is a robotics competition, not a metalworking competition. Every team that can get access to professional machining uses it. There's no reason not to.

Quote:
Now coopertition. 2056 and 1114 always pick each other, and end up winning each time. It's not even a surprise anymore, and I doubt you feel accomplished.
To clarify: The point of this competition is to do the best. That's what motivates people. If 1114 and 2056 always pick each other, and then always win, do you think maybe the reason is because 1114 and 2056 are the best? The idea is for you to do better to beat them, not for people to actively sabotage them. 1114 and 2056 have no responsibility to pick teams they think are worse, just because those teams don't get a chance to win. There are only 3 winning slots at each competition. Nobody deserves a better chance to get them than what they get.
__________________
Student 294: 2007-2011
Mentor 597: 2013-2015
Google SWE: 2015-