Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NickTosta
Based on what I've seen so far I'd have to go with the first one. A good autonomous and a good teleop are more than enough to offset the 20 points gained by getting the third robot on the bridge.
|
I disagree. Say they are 60% accurate. That means six points (one of two balls) in auton, leaving 12 in teleop. If they were 100% accurate, they would need to score 4 balls to be as good as a "pure triple balancer" robot. Since they are 60% accurate, that number gets closer to 7 balls. That is a tall order for most robots and teams. |
Well, what is important to remember is that not only can two robots on a bridge balance significantly faster than three robots, but it also frees up one robot to score for the entire match.
So, to use your example from above, let's say this robot gets 6 points in autonomous and scores 2 baskets, or 6 points, in teleop. That's pretty reasonable for a lot of teams. So, they score 12 points total.
But now, what you have to consider is the powerhouse team that picked the alliance - because you aren't going for a triple balance anymore, they have probably 30 seconds of extra scoring that they otherwise would not have had. The best scoring bot on the alliance scoring 9 points in 30 seconds is pretty reasonable I think. That brings that robot's total contribution to 21 points, and that is assuming that they bring relatively little to the table in teleop and autonomous.
And, of course, the triple balance is still on the table with Bot A.