Quote:
Originally Posted by 372 lives on
i like how the winning alliance at Oregon isn't on the first or second page yet several other teams at Oregon are much closer to the top.
seems accurate.
|
The thing about Oregon is that the teams that won, won because they had a good strategy, which was also a strategy that none of them implemented before the finals. Together they pulled off triple balance after triple balance, but when they played on there own during the qualification matches, they had significantly lower scores (on average).
Basically, they have a lot of low scores to balance out the high ones they got during eliminations, while other teams in the finals (1983 specifically) were high scorers throughout the entire event.