[IKE]

Reasonable arguments can be made for a 6v0. I can/will make them if necessary. "META-Coopertition" as layed out above was an attempt at a 35v2. "v2" being the most important part of that statement.
It really could have just as easily have been "v3" or "v4" talking with the folks out that way. While everyone thinks they know who will be in the #1 alliance, most were pretty confident who would be against them in the finals. How do you think the 2 lead teams of the Finalists would have dealt with a 33v4 scenario?

In 2008, a friend gave me a card that has some quotes that have helped him in his life. One in particular that pertains to this converstation:

Can you look yourself in the mirror and say with confidence that you have:
*accomplished much
*with the help of many
*at the expense of none

The last point of that quote is very difficult to achieve, but a great thing to strive for.