Thread: Wheelbases
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2012, 12:48
Cal578 Cal578 is offline
Passionate FIRST-er, CD donor
AKA: Gerry
FRC #0578 (Red Raider Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 256
Cal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant futureCal578 has a brilliant future
Re: Wheelbases

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
We discovered this year that we could get too much traction on a wide base robot, so it could not turn while not moving forward/backward.
I thought wide base was easier to turn (all other factors being equal) than a long base. For the same torque per wheel, you get more turning torque (a longer moment arm about the center of desired rotation). Also, the shorter wheelbase gives less inherent resistance to the turn (a wheelbase of 0 would be very easy to turn, and an infinite wheelbase would be impossible to turn if the wheels have non-zero sideways traction).
__________________
Cal
R3: Red Raider Robotics (FRC Team 578)
Fairport, NY, USA
www.FairportRobotics.org
2016 Finger Lakes Regional: Semifinalist on Alliance 7 (1128, 2010, 578)
2016 NYC Regional: Finalist on Alliance 3 (3419, 578, 3017), 4th seed team, Team Spirit Award
2015 Finger Lakes Regional: 8-3-0 in qualification, 7th seed, Quarterfinalist
2014 NY Tech Valley Regional: 8-4-0 in qualification, 13th seed, Semifinalist
2013 Finger Lakes Regional: 4-5-0 in qualification, 26th seed, Alliance 6, 1-2 in tournament
2012 Buckeye Regional: Gracious Professionalism Award, 7-3-0, 14th seed
2011 Finger Lakes Regional: Engineering Inspiration Award
Reply With Quote