View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2012, 20:25
seg9585's Avatar
seg9585 seg9585 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric
FRC #4276 (Surf City Vikings)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Boeing (Seal Beach, CA)
Posts: 520
seg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Modular systems in FRC

I like this idea. During a time in which many engineering companies (especially aerospace) are attempting to modularize their products (to reduce cost, etc) and establish standards, teaching students about modularization would be very beneficial.
I could imagine a rule where mechanism swap-out must take <5 minutes, so the robots would have to be designed to accommodate different mechanisms/payloads with the same robot bus. Wire harnessing, structural attachments, etc would all come into play, and this idea would push pre-match strategy even further.
When mechanisms break, swapping it out with a different type for the next match -- while the pit crew works to rebuild the broken mechanism -- would also make queuing run more smoothly. It gives the pit crew something to do while the robot is in a match, at the very least.
__________________
My FIRST legacy:

Team 204 Student 2001, 2002 (Voorhees, NJ)
Team 1493 College Mentor 2006 - 2008 (Troy, NY)
Team 2150 Intern/Professional Mentor 2007, 2009 (Palos Verdes)
Team 4123 Lead Engineering Mentor 2012 (Bellflower, CA)
Team 4276 Engineering Mentor 2012-2016 (Huntington Beach, CA)
Reply With Quote