View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-03-2012, 12:01
Peck's Avatar
Peck Peck is offline
worse then failing: proving murphy
FRC #1619 (Up-A-Creek Robotics) and FTC # 4633)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 237
Peck will become famous soon enough
Re: Bridge lowering force calculation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Freeman View Post
I think what Chris explained here is one of the biggest reasons why many teams bridge manipulators do not function as well as required.

We saw lots of pneumatic manipulators at Waterford that originally did not take into account the breakdown of horizontal and vertical components of force being applied to the bridge.
Also keep in mind that:
  • the torque created shifts as the bridge moves. This formula happens to provide a built in quantity that partly allows for the shift. However, It dose not accommodate a shifting contact point (having the same point of contact for the entirety is hard to design and have strong enough to take the abuse of FRC).
  • your motors/pneumatic won't be a constant force for all times used and will become weaker over time. The greater the buffer amount built in, the slower It will deteriorate and the easier It will be to compensate.
__________________
Cad, Electrical, Machining, Debugging (old school), PR, Distraction elimination


TEAM 1619
__UP-A-Creek Robotics__
It ain't done till it's over-done