View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-03-2012, 13:56
Bongle's Avatar
Bongle Bongle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2702 (REBotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 1,069
Bongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Bongle
Re: Week 3 OPR - All regionals/district and World ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Law View Post
You get 10 bridge points for balancing on the coop bridge which is the same if you were to go to the alliance bridge to balance on your own or with a partner. I think this is Bongle's reasoning to choose to do it this way.

Ether, I added columns to show adjusted OPR bridge points and overall OPR and use that for ranking purpose. Teams can change the number of points for each Coop bridge point but the ranking will not be recalculated. I am still trying to write out in .xls format but without any luck so far.
My reasoning was that the 2 CP points earned by each alliance could have been 10 bridge points for each alliance if their alliance members had decided to go for the alliance bridges instead of the CP bridge.

Really, I should've just left the adjustment only in the bridge category rather than also including it in the overall OPR as well. But several sets of stats had already been posted, and removing it would make week-against-week comparisons difficult. The reasoning for including it in overall OPR was that teams who were on the CP bridge every match rather than the alliance bridges would rank very low in the "prestigious" overall OPR, even though they could've ranked quite high if only they'd balanced a different bridge.

Last edited by Bongle : 19-03-2012 at 14:24.
Reply With Quote