Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Steele
Do you think the whole team should go up to receive the chairman's award?
finalist, champion?
Why should the other awards be any different?
|
Yes I think the whole team should go up for Chairmans, Winner, Finalist, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dancin103
Akash,
For example, if the team wins KPCB Entrepreneurship, it took the whole team to compile that business plan to where it is.
All in all, this is a team, and not about the I's or the sub teams. Sorry, but I disagree with you.
Cassie
|
entrepreneurship was a bad example on my part. Depending on how your awards teams operate, you could have a few up to many students/mentors working on a submission and actually creating the business plan.
Haha, I didn't say you had to agree with what I thought about certain awards, no need to be sorry for that. I simply appreciate it when large teams send up a few students to receive something like website and animation awards because those were, in fact, only worked on by certain students/mentors.
I see this as something opposite of what most of you said. I see it as allowing certain students to be recognized in front of their own team but also other teams for something specific they have done. So no, I don't think Websites and animations are worked on by an entire team - if they are on your team, then that's awesome. I simply think that recognition of a few for these specific awards is important rather than sending up an entire team. The fact that a few minutes of time are saved- okay sure maybe I was a little harsh there, but hey everyone likes getting to a comfy bed as soon as competition day is done!
And Andrew- people reading these posts can form an opinion on their own.