View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-03-2012, 20:38
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: URGET RULE QUESTION: Bumper Zone

Quote:
Originally Posted by bduddy View Post
To avoid any confusion, I believe that the robot in question has a drivetrain such that it can actively change its "ride height" and thus its bumper height; it's not just suspension travel. If indeed this allows the robot to place its bumpers outside the Bumper Zone, I don't think it should be competing, but that's just me...
You might be right, but I interpreted this post a bit differently than you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aechmtwash11 View Post
What happens is our drive train will raise up when we accelerate. This is an side effect of having a freely articulating drive train to converse the bump.
If the drivetrain were actively articulated, a solution would be as easy as some programming to prevent unwanted articulation. But since the OP said it was freely floating, I believe that the motion is unpowered which would cause the drive to rock during starting/stopping/changing direction. If they added a slight bit of resistance to this motion (Think a simple spring to dampen it) it might be all they need to keep the bumpers legal while also retaining what sounds to be a nifty mechanism.
Reply With Quote