Quote:
Originally Posted by JR.
The only issue with using the average OPR is that is disregards changes made between competitions and leads to an inacurate ranking. I think ranking the OPR's from teams leatest event is a more accurate way to rank teams via OPR because it represents what teams are doing currently not in week 1 or 2. An example of this is 365, in week 2 at chestnut hill district they had an OPR of 21.2 ranking 82nd over all while week 4 at Lenape with a new shooter 365 had an OPR of 31.1 ranking 11th or using teams latest event's OPR ranking 7th.
|
This is definitely a limitation of OPR. I am not sure how valid it is to compare OPRs across events at all, for that matter. I am a much bigger fan of CCWM (OPR+DPR), since it better reflects contributions to score DIFFERENTIAL rather than raw score itself. Many top teams leave a lot of potential points on the field once they see they have built a big lead so that they can ensure a higher success % on the Coopertition Bridge.
P.S. I really like the new shooter
