View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-04-2012, 12:48
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,189
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Crazy robot idea for this year 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
It depends on the prop, and the air density. Quite possibly even the specific prop. The one overarching question which won't be answered by motor power is prop thrust--motor power is good for getting that thrust, but can't be precisely correlated without some testing. A 27x13 is quite a hefty prop, even for a hefty motor like an FP.

And I've seen a case where the same prop tested at two different thrust levels in two different locations. Not fun trying to figure out why...I suspect it had something to do with either the air density or a mounting change, or both.
Well, air density at FIRST venues, which are often climate controlled and at fixed altitudes, shouldn't be too hard to calculate, plus the mounting won't change as long as it is on the robot. Additionally, the same website also sells 26, 24, 22, 21, 20.5, and 20 inch props in varying pitches.

Does anyone have performance data from 2009 for similarly sized propellers?
__________________
Reply With Quote