Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday
So why wasn't [G25] applied to 67 when there was a blue robot touching them while balancing?
|
Because 67 never touched the bridge directly. (At best, you could say 67 interfered with the bridge because the other robot fell on it, but then [G44] would apply and negate the foul.)
As for [G28], I don't know the circumstances of what happened with 67. If they E-stopped in that position (understanding the implications), there might be an argument to be made that the resulting contact was purposeful (and it was obviously consequential). On the other hand, sitting immobile isn't a very good indicator of purpose. I'd say the call on the field was a good one: one foul.