Thread: 2012 MSC
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-04-2012, 17:58
RufflesRidge RufflesRidge is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 992
RufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant futureRufflesRidge has a brilliant future
Re: 2012 MSC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Adams View Post
Why would it be G44 protected? No opponent put 67 where they were.
Because they weren't touching the bridge, hence no possible way to incur [G25] by themselves, if they were to be moved into contact with the bridge it would have had to have been by the opposing alliance.

Quote:
[G25] Robots may not contact or otherwise interfere with the opposing Alliance Bridge.
Note: I am suggesting that the appropriate call for hitting the overhanging edge of a robot on the bridge, per the rules as written, is a Tech foul [G28] even if that contact unbalances a balanced bridge or otherwise interferes with balancing. The "If the act...." section of G25 is written as part of the "Violation" section which means that it is used to stipulate the penalty for violating the rule which requires a violation of the rule itself to begin with (touching the bridge).