|
Atwood,Chiaphua,CIM...whatever!
Antonio,
I could kick myself for not remembering the exact #'s, but I'll get it for tomorrow. We, just for the heck of it, put it on a tachometer/strobe and found that both motors were VERY much slower than last year's motors. We used the same strobe last year, so I know that that isn't the problem. I want to say that it is less than 4000 rpms but I might be mistaken. I'm sure that before I can post our actual #'s some one will have some data of their own.
BTW both motors were within 4-7 rpms of each other--which is pretty good. Also there was the anticipated 175 rpm difference between foward and reverse.
|