View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-04-2012, 08:55
MechEng83's Avatar
MechEng83 MechEng83 is offline
Lead Mentor/Engineer
AKA: Mr. Cool
FRC #1741 (Red Alert)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 617
MechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Bill's Blog] 4/18/12: Are you excited yet?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carol View Post
A lot of regionals have set the pit area to 9 x 9 in the past, so teams should have been aware of the possibility at STL and not be surprised.
Ok, I'm going to object to that line of reasoning. What if a team has been fortunate to only be at regionals where the pit size has always been 10'x10'x10'? You expect those teams who have never experienced the pit size contraction to be aware of other regionals' pit sizes?

I'm fully aware of the administrative manual stating the pit size may be smaller, and to plan accordingly. There is no mention of a minimum pit dimension, which I think would be nice (as an engineer, I like to bound my requirements). I do appreciate the heads up from Bill, because I'm sure there are many teams who aren't aware that the pit size could be smaller than 10'x10'x10'
Reply With Quote