Quote:
Originally Posted by autox_vette
In the off season, our team is working on developing a swerve drive.
I have heard arguments (each way) concerning the fitness of Labview as a programming language for our robots (and don't want to spark a heated debate here).
Has anyone programmed a fully functional (i.e. simultaneous translate and rotate) swerve drive using Labview? If so, given the option, would you do so again?
Thanks,
Kenton
|
I think the tacit premise of the question is misguided.
The difficulty
1 of developing software for swerve is an
algorithmic issue, not a
coding issue.
LabVIEW, C++, Java, Python - they're all more than powerful and concise enough to express the necessary algorithms efficiently,
once you've figured out the algorithms.
1the inverse kinematics is not the difficult part.