[Mike o.]

I would have to disagree that the problem is tangible. In all honesty, there is no proof nor is there any doubt that the problems are with either the field and/or the robot. We all know that there is a problem somewhere, but where is truly the question. We are all dealing with technology and resources that are being used in a means that is not ideal or meant to be mixed together. If you really think about it, if FIRST went the route of creating a system that was as robust as possible for the purposes that we are using it for, it would be highly costly and bulky for both parties. With the mix of technology/resources of different "application" along with the intensity and "abuse" we give everything, it truly is hard to nail down the exact root cause of the problems. What anyone really is able to do is take in the information that they have, diagnose the problem to the best of their ability and make the most reasonable assessment that they can come to. Can or may that assessment be incorrect from time to time, yes, we are all human, but sometimes it may actually turn out to be correct, as I'm sure many of us have seen in several cases. I was in St. Louis and had a good seat to see all that went on, and yes it was a little disheartening to see what happen unfold, but in the end can you not agree that all those on and off the field did their best to evaluate the situation and make the best calls possible? I just feel a little more credit needs to be given to the crew and their hard work throughout the season than rather bash them endlessly.

Sorry for the rant, but I just thought I would toss in my 2 cents.