View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-04-2012, 21:30
vhcook's Avatar
vhcook vhcook is offline
Reader of Things
AKA: Victoria
FRC #1939 (Kuh-nig-its)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 546
vhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond reputevhcook has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Just an idea...regarding the recent FMS problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
Ja, but the endpoints aren't cRios. They may be slightly (slightly) more difficult to have handle a dual communications path.
Certainly, particularly given the port constraints of the cRIO and the fact that the wireless gear is custom designed for the purpose, while we're integrating existing devices. I'm just saying it's technically possible in the general case. There are probably easier ways to accomplish traffic segregation within the IP protocol anyway.

I'm also going to admit to a cognitive bias toward this kind of setup because I spend most of my time working on systems where control messages and user data are logically (and often physically) segregated to protect the control signals.

And on that note I'm going to let this go, since we don't even know if this solution matches up with the actual problem at all. Waiting on the troubleshooters without the ability to help is always the hardest part.
__________________


Reply With Quote