Thread: Success Metric
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-05-2012, 12:25
Donovan0217's Avatar
Donovan0217 Donovan0217 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0217 (The Thunderchickens)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19
Donovan0217 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Success Metric

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzag View Post
Basically, the question here is, is it possible to create a statistic to measure the probable success of a robot/alliance?
Details: Theoretically, given a field of any number of robots (around the size of a regional) assign those robots a number indicating the percentage of robots receiving a lower number. Be able to use this measurement to predict which alliance will win a match with reliable accuracy.

Is this possible, how accurate is it, and what is the formula to calculate it?
While this is technically possible, it is far from accurate to calculate it with a number because some factors are intangible and unable to put a number to. One of these is the strategical factor, and it is really difficult to put a number to that, even as a ranking of the teams, because different types of strategies may be more effective then others at different points.

How would you choose to rank a team that is amazing at strategizing, but has an average to poor level robot, versus a team that has an amazing robot but a very low level strategy system?
__________________
Student 2012, Mentor 2013-present
2013 Michigan State Champions (469, 3539, 217)
2013 Newton Finalists (1986, 1538, 217)
2015 Archimedes Finalists (1640, 1310, 217)
2016 Newton Champions (217, 3476, 4678, 188)