Quote:
Originally Posted by IKE
2377 had a lot more points associated with 1538 than we did (and apparently team 25 as well). They were really good, but we figured they would be bubble second round (which agrees with the 25 data) as opposed to an early first round looking at the 2377 data.
Our system is paper based. I will see if I can get it into some sort of sharable format.
|
Note: Our data shows 1538 with 16 "balance points" (a single balance worth 1, and a double balance worth 2). That is more than any other team in the division. We applied a weighting factor of 4 to this which boosted them up some. Even without this however, they were very good.