My Arm Design Methodology:
1. What orientation is the scoring object in when I pick it up?
2. What orientation is the optimum orientation of the object for scoring?
3. What elevation changes do I need to make to the object?
4. What is the simplest mechanism I can use to accomplish the above orientation and elevation changes?
Now, #4 is a bit tricky since "simplest" is somewhat subjective. How do I define "simplest"? My personal concept:
- The less degrees of freedom the better.
- The less actuators required, the better. (I give bonus points for pneumatics over DC motors, since they are simpler control wise).
- Easy to control -- I want to be able to drive it with default code. I want my drivers to be able to maneuver it almost intuitively.
- Low power -- I don't want to need to use a lot of motor power to actuate it. I like any arm I can use passive assistance on (i.e. surgical tubing) to do the majority of the work.
IMHO, multiple jointed arms rarely result from this methodology...
-John