View Single Post
  #189   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-05-2012, 02:20
Zebra_Fact_Man's Avatar
Zebra_Fact_Man Zebra_Fact_Man is offline
]\/[ Go Blue!
AKA: Solomon
FRC #1076 (Pi Hi Samurai)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 454
Zebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant future
Re: IRI - Dates, Info and Rule Ideas

As a person that enjoys watching both offensive throw-downs and defensive struggles, I am adamantly against any system that instinctively punishes defensive play. A team should not be punished for figuring out a new way to defeat the opposing alliance.

That is the main flaw with any system that adheres to match points to assign ranking points; it inherently favors one style of gameplay over the other, which is an unfair bias. In reality, a 76-75 match is just as exciting as a 12-11 match, but one is favored over the other in a score-based ranking system.

This is my primary complaint with the mentioned system. The Coop bridge does not have this problem because it is independent of the score outcome i.e. independent of the gameplay style.
Reply With Quote