View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2012, 13:37
JamesTerm's Avatar
JamesTerm JamesTerm is offline
Terminator
AKA: James Killian
FRC #3481 (Bronc Botz)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 298
JamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to beholdJamesTerm is a splendid one to behold
Re: paper: Team 1114 Controls and Programming Overview 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
If you plot your data so that the joystick command is on the Y axis, and the actual Vic output is on the X axis, then you don't need to invert anything analytically. It's already inverted. All you have to do is fit the trendline and you've got your linearization function. See the Excel file link in my previous post in this thread.

Thanks for this response and so I want to flash back to this one:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...d=13215692 33

The curve is similar to this one you posted, but just a bit more curvy at the end. Should this process of working out the curve be custom for any given rotary system? It seems like I could use any of these equations and they would be in the ball park, but I'd probably want to go through these steps on each robot, and each closed loop rotary system because of other properties like model of victor and the work load that it is controlling. Well that is really the question, does the work load impact the kind of curve you will have? Are there other factors which may contribute to the curve being different from one robot/rotary system to the next, and if so, is it significant enough to be worth the effort?
Reply With Quote