Thread: Building Smaller Robots
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-05-2012, 17:49
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,831
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Building Smaller Robots
If you are planning to use CIMs, then you are likely using an FRC battery... so your robot is likely going to weigh more than 50 pounds. It is also likely to be able to move pretty quickly, and its frame will likely be able to inflict damage on whatever it hits.

I'm pointing this out because the commercial robot kits, such as the VEX controller, have failsafe systems where the robot will stop if it loses a signal from its controller.

I really like PICs, Arduinos and all the other low cost options, but there are some good reasons to pay for the layer of engineering that wraps a commercial robot control solution.... particularly if you aren't 100% sure how to program a safe, reliable, control system on your own.

Just a thought. The old VEX PIC controller works great on one of our old FRC robots.

Jason