View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-05-2012, 20:01
avanboekel's Avatar
avanboekel avanboekel is offline
Registered User
AKA: Adam Van Boekel
FRC #5934 (Gear it Forward, Crowbotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 372
avanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant future
Re: [MCC] Minimum Competitive Concept 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
I have a question for all of you "low goal dump in auto" guys. Which is simpler to build & program for autonomous: a robot that sits in place and launches 2 balls at the basket via a single control loop, or a robot that moves towards the basket (presumably in a straight line ... oh wait) and then dumps?

Now the same question, without knowing about the ball inconsistencies?

Now the same question, with a team who will do what it takes to tweak, hone-in, and otherwise calibrate to mitigate the ball inconsistencies?
I agree with you that it is easier to program a bot to just sit there and shoot than to drive up to the fender and shoot. However, it takes a much more powerful shooter as well as a more precise shot. IMO, it is easier overall to drive up and shoot.
__________________


2338 Gear It Forward | Student 2010-2013 | Mentor 2014-Present | oswegofirst.org
2013 Wisconsin Regional Winner (1732, 111, 2338)
2013 Midwest Regional Dean's List Finalist
2015 Midwest Regional Chairman's Award Winner
2015 Archimedes Subdivision Winner (1023, 2338, 3996, 1089)
2016 Midwest Regional Chairman's Award Winner
4096 CTRL-Z | Mentor 2014 | team4096.org
5934 Crowbotics | Mentor 2016-Present | crowbotics.org